Wednesday 6 April 2016

Who is Behind The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists...?

A: "Them."



Pyjama Media.


NeoConservatives never do or think anything even remotely original, and you can smell it on them from a mile away, swathed around a burning, purtid thirst for REVENGE - in 1990s, they were determined to force  [Bill] Clinton from office in shame and disgrace in the non-existent Whitewatergate Scamdal as payback for the actions of Congressional Democrats 20 years earlier in the wake of Watergate. 

Because, you know - both cases were, like, EXACTLY the same...

Neo-Con Turd Richard Miniter, and "friend", c.2002

It's not "The Panama Papers", it's "The PYJAMA Papers" - as in Pyjama Media, the privatised Intelligence content-mill that produced Innocence of Muslims in 2012 - these people really are as stupid as they assume we all are...

"Why don't you try one of these Jamacian cigars, Mr. Ambassador, they're pretty good!"

The Ginger Twat Milner poses au debonair for his mates with an undersized stogie cigar, whilst razzing on the House of Clinton for Monicagate.

Which is likely the closest he has, or will ever get to an actual fat ginger twat, or anything even remotely close to that.

Quoting Alex Constantine, author of The Covert War Against Rock and Psychic Dictatorship :




"Shortly after the September 11 attacks, Miniter left the Journal to join the investigative reporting team of the Sunday Times (of London), Britain's largest quality paper. Miniter co-wrote a four-part series, "The Road to Ground Zero." The series won first prize by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

In early 2002, Miniter was contracted to write a book that became Losing bin Laden. He would spend the next 18 months reporting from Khartoum, Cairo, Frankfurt, Hamburg, London, Paris and Washington to offer an authoritative account of the bin Laden menace during the Clinton years. It became a New York Times bestseller, peaking at no. 9 in September 2003. Losing bin Laden was cited on NBC's "Meet the Press" by host Tim Russert. The book was also praised in columns by George F. Will, Steve Forbes and Robert Novak.

Miniter's next book was drawn from on-the-ground reporting in Iraq, Kuwait, Egypt, Sudan, Hong Kong, Singapore and the Philippines. Shadow War: The Untold Story of How America is Winning the War on Terror became his second New York Times bestseller, debuting at no.7.

Miniter's latest book is entitled Disinformation: 22 Media Myths That Undermine the War on Terror. Based on exclusive interviews and official documents, the book challenges many widely-held notions: that Bin Laden was trained or financed by the CIA in the 1980s, that Halliburton profiteered in Iraq, that profiling Arabs at airports would stop terrorism, and that the U.S.-Mexico border is an open door for Al Qaeda."




Q : What is The Center for Public Integrity?

A : LEFT-COVER



  • Watch this page

The Center for Public Integrity is a U.S.-based non-profit investigative journalism group that was founded by Charles Lewis.

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists "was launched in 1997 as a project of the Center for Public Integrity to extend globally the Center's style of watchdog journalism in the public interest by marshaling the talents of the world's leading investigative reporters to focus on issues that do not stop at water's edge." [1]

History

When the CPI was established in May 1990, advertising and government grants were ruled out. Aside from foundations, the CPI gained $US500,000 in its first five years from a smattering of corporations - Intel, W. R. Grace & Co, DuPont and Milliken & Co, and a public service employees union.

Corporate and union funding inevitably attracted criticism about potential conflicts of interest that echoed charges the CPI levelled at others. The CPI now excludes funding from corporations or unions and is laregly funded by philanthropic foundations.

Charles Lewis, a former producer at CBS and ABC television networks, founded CPI and served as its executive director until 2004.

Major Institutional Funders

Board

Accessed July 2013: [2]

  • Bill BuzenbergMolly Bingham , Charles EisendrathDan A. EmmettBruce A. Finzen , Matthew W. GranadeArianna HuffingtonJames A. KiernanSteve KroftHendrik-Jan Laseurennifer LeeSusan LoewenbergBevis LongstrethOlivia MaCraig NewmarkGilbert OmennScott SieglerMarianne Szegedy-Maszak , Matt Thompson

Former Directors

Source

Advisory Board

Contact details

910 17th Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (202) 466-1300
Web: http://www.publicintegrity.org

Websites:

Resources and articles

Related Sourcewatch articles

References

  1. About, Center for Public Integrity, accessed June 11, 2008.
  2. Center for Public Integrity Board, organizational web page, accessed July 18, 2013.

External links

  • Bob Burton, "Journalism's new standard bearers", Media, The Australian, July 19, 2001.

Sunday 3 April 2016

ARTICLE BY FIDEL : Brother Obama



 3/28/2016 3:22 PM
HAVANA, MARCH 28, 2016

OFFICIAL VOICE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CUBA CENTRAL COMMITTEE

UPDATED 12:22:31

(https://www.facebook.com /pages
/Granma- Engl(ihsthtps://twitter.com /230/5G5r9a6(n/4fme7ea1d_0)E1n1g7l5is)h)


ARTICLE BY FIDEL

Brother Obama

We don’t need the empire to give us anything. Our efforts will be legal and peaceful, because our commitment is to peace and fraternity among all human beings who live on this planet.

Author: Fidel Castro Ruz (/archivo?a=482) | internet@granma.cu (mailto:internet@granma.cu)
march 28, 2016 12:03:14

The kings of Spain brought us the conquistadores and masters, whose footprints remained in the circular land grants assigned to those searching for gold in the sands of rivers, an abusive and shameful form of exploitation, traces of which can be noted from the air in many places around the country.


Tourism today, in large part, consists of viewing the delights of our landscapes and tasting exquisite delicacies from our seas, and is always shared with the private capital of large foreign corporations, whose earnings, if they don’t reach billions of dollars, are not worthy of any attention whatsoever.


Since I find myself obliged to mention the issue, I must add - principally for the youth - that few people are aware of the importance of such a condition, in this singular moment of human history. 


I would not say that time has been lost, but I do not hesitate to affirm that we are not adequately informed, not you, nor us, of the knowledge and conscience that we must have to confront the realities which challenge us. 


The first to be taken into consideration is that our lives are but a fraction of a historical second, which must also be devoted in part to the vital necessities of every human being. One of the characteristics of this condition is the tendency to overvalue its role, in contrast, on the other hand, with the extraordinary number of persons who embody the loftiest dreams.


Nevertheless, no one is good or bad entirely on their own. None of us is designed for the role we must assume in a revolutionary society, although Cubans had the privilege of José Martí’s example. 


I even ask myself if he needed to die or not in Dos Ríos, when he said, “For me, it’s time,” and charged the Spanish forces entrenched in a solid line of firepower. He did not want to return to the United States, and there was no one who could make him. Someone ripped some pages from his diary. 

Who bears this treacherous responsibility, undoubtedly the work of an unscrupulous conspirator? Differences between the leaders were well known, but never indiscipline. 

“Whoever attempts to appropriate Cuba will reap only the dust of its soil drenched in blood, if he does not perish in the struggle,” stated the glorious Black leader Antonio Maceo. 

Máximo Gómez is likewise recognized as the most disciplined and discreet military chief in our history.


Looking at it from another angle, how can we not admire the indignation of Bonifacio Byrne when, from a distant boat returning him to Cuba, he saw another flag alongside that of the single star and declared, “My flag is that which has never been mercenary...” immediately adding one of the most beautiful phrases I have ever heard, “If it is torn to shreds, it will be my flag one day... our dead raising their arms will still be able to defend it!” 

Nor will I forget the blistering words of Camilo Cienfuegos that night, when, just some tens of meters away, bazookas and machine guns of U.S. origin in the hands of counterrevolutionaries were pointed toward that terrace on which we stood.




Obama was born in August of 1961, as he himself explained. More than half a century has transpired since that time.


Let us see, however, how our illustrious guest thinks today:

“I have come here to bury the last remnant of the Cold War in the Americas. I have come here to extend the hand of friendship to the Cuban people,” 

followed by a deluge of concepts entirely novel for the majority of us:

“We both live in a new world, colonized by Europeans,” the U.S. President continued, “Cuba, like the United States, was built in part by slaves brought here from Africa. Like the United States, the Cuban people can trace their heritage to both slaves and slave-owners.”



The native populations don’t exist at all in Obama’s mind.

[ N.B. And Obama himself, if his legally recognised paternity is truthful and accurate, that his true father was Barack Obama Sr., the exchange student from Kenya, has no personal or family connection in his heritage to the ecconomic system and institution of American Negro Slavery, the Transatlantic Slave Trade or the Emancipation Proclaimation whatsoever. 

He is not the scion of freed slaves - his father was a borderline alcoholic former taxi-cab driver from Nairobi, born within the British Empire as a subject of the Crown in British East Africa.

Unless Frank Lloydd Davis is indeed his true father. ]

Nor does he say that the Revolution swept away racial discrimination, or that pensions and salaries for all Cubans were decreed by it before Mr. Barrack Obama was 10 years old. The hateful, racist bourgeois custom of hiring strongmen to expel Black citizens from recreational centers was swept away by the Cuban Revolution - that which would go down in history for the battle against apartheid that liberated Angola, putting an end to the presence of nuclear weapons on a continent of more than a billion inhabitants. This was not the objective of our solidarity, but rather to help the peoples of Angola, Mozambique, Guinea Bissau and others under the fascist colonial domination of Portugal.


In 1961, just one year and three months after the triumph of the Revolution, a mercenary force with armored artillery and infantry, backed by aircraft, trained and accompanied by U.S. warships and aircraft carriers, attacked our country by surprise. Nothing can justify that perfidious attack which cost our country hundreds of losses, including deaths and injuries.


As for the pro-yankee assault brigade, no evidence exists anywhere that it was possible to evacuate a single mercenary. Yankee combat planes were presented before the United Nations as the equipment of a Cuban uprising.


The military experience and power of this country is very well known. In Africa, they likewise believed that revolutionary Cuba would be easily taken out of the fight. The invasion via southern Angola by racist South African motorized brigades got close to Luanda, the capital in the eastern part of the country. There a struggle began which went on for no less than 15 years. I wouldn’t even talk about this, if I didn’t have the elemental duty to respond to Obama’s speech in Havana’s Alicia Alonso Grand Theater.


Nor will I attempt to give details, only emphasize that an honorable chapter in the struggle for human liberation was written there. In a certain way, I hoped Obama’s behavior would be correct. His humble origin and natural intelligence were evident. Mandela was imprisoned for life and had become a giant in the struggle for human dignity. One day, a copy of a book narrating part of Mandela’s life reached my hands, and - surprise! - the prologue was by Barack Obama. I rapidly skimmed the pages. The miniscule size of Mandela’s handwriting noting facts was incredible. 


Knowing men such as him was worthwhile.

Regarding the episode in South Africa I must point out another experience. I was really interested in learning more about how the South Africans had acquired nuclear weapons. I only had very precise information that there were no more than 10 or 12 bombs. 

A reliable source was the professor and researcher Piero Gleijeses, who had written the text Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington, and Africa, 1959-1976, an excellent piece. I knew he was the most reliable source on what had happened and I told him so; he responded that he had not spoken more about the matter as in the text he had responded to questions from compañero Jorge Risquet, who had been Cuban ambassador and collaborator in Angola, a very good friend of his. I located Risquet; already undertaking other important tasks he was finishing a course which would last several weeks longer. That task coincided with a fairly recent visit by Piero to our country; I had warned him that Risquet was getting on and his health was not great. A few days later what I had feared occurred. Risquet deteriorated and died. When Piero arrived there was nothing to do except make promises, but I had already received information related to the weapons and the assistance that racist South Africa had received from Reagan and Israel.

Old Labour Oxford Economist Martin Summers talks about what he believes was a secret and highly illegal nuclear arms deal involving a young and ambitious David Cameron as well as Doctor David Kelly. Done behind the back of Nelson Mandela and the ANC, designed to raise £17.8m Tory funding for the 1992 General Election Campaign 

-- Origins of Mystery Donation of £17.8 millions: If we can recall HANSARD 22nd June 1993 we can find the following:
Column 197
Mr. Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In 1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company accounts. 

Cameron's freebie to apartheid South Africa
Tory leader admitted his party had got it wrong over sanctions when he later visited Mandela
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/...

I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 million was shown in company accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million. We want to know where that £17.8 million came from. 
It is very clear where this money came from as well as the token offer given to Blair.
Right from the onset a small group of people in both the US and UK knew of this deal and how the weapons that the British Taxpayer had paid for had gone missing. On this side of the Pond we can be rest assured that the following people knew: Thatcher (Mother and Son Mark), David Cameron, the nobleman with the initials of KW, John Major and his senior guys. On the Labour Party side of the fence it would have been Tony Blair and his close team followed by Gordon Brown. As we already know Thatcher put in an appearance at Number 10 Downing Street when they both came into office.. once can assume it was not to congratulate them!
http://petereyrepatch.blogspot.co.uk/...

Let's refresh our minds as to what happened in 1989 when a young Tory researcher, David Cameron (under the apron strings of Maggie Thatcher) went to South Africa on a sanctions busting all expenses paid trip (paid for by ARMSCOR) to Pellindaba a nuclear weapons facility.
Sir Ken Warren who went to South Africa with David Cameron to illegally purchase three 20kt nuclear bombs, which then resulted in the theft of £17.8 million tax payers money which then (due to gross neglect) allowed them to be stolen and sold on the black market
Under the UN radar, South Africa, with the help of Israel, developed ten bombs and test fired one at Prince Edward Island to the South of the country. 
This left nine weapons that caused South Africa, US, UK and Israel great concern as they did not want them to fall into the hands of the next black regime.
The plan was to ship the entire load to Chicago for decommissioning but Maggie Thatcher had other ideas and so just before she finished in office she signed an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) document that listed them as being three cylinders!
They were prepared and shipped in standard 20 foot sea containers from Durban to Oman without any security. There was a hidden observation window so that the core temperature could be checked as required.
The deal was arranged privately using British Taxpayers money involving the arms dealer John Bredenkamp with the assistance of Mark Thatcher and many high profile politicians. £17.8 million was siphoned into the Tory Party Election Fund.. this money was exposed by the Labour Party in Parliament by Lord Doug Hoyle and Margaret Beckett MP and is listed in Hansard June 22 1993 from Column 197.
The nuclear bombs arrived in Oman, were put into an insecure compound and checked by Dr. David Kelly who had the responsibility to look after the weapons and check that they were in good condition prior to the release of the money. (So you see dear Dr. Kelly knew too much).
Some time later the three weapons were stolen by the same arms dealer, John Bredenkamp and sold on the black market.
It was believed that these weapons found their way to Iraq but were then moved into Syria in three ambulances as they were highly mobile.
Tony Blair with the help of Alastair Campbell then sexed up the Iraq Dossier to influence the UK into going to war.. the only problem was that if having nuclear bombs was justification for going to war, then we went to war with the wrong country.
Tony Blair created the Nuclear Explosions Act which technically would now cause great concern for many of the players that took part in this highly illegal and deeply flawed operation.
Did Ms Tara Davison have information that could have blown open this deceit at the Chillcot Inquiry?
http://eyreinternational.wordpress.co...

I do not know what Obama would have to say about this story now. I am unaware as to what he did or did not know, although it is very unlikely that he knew absolutely nothing. My modest suggestion is that he gives it thought and does not attempt now to elaborate theories on Cuban policy.


There is an important issue:

Obama made a speech in which he uses the most sweetened words to express: “It is time, now, to forget the past, leave the past behind, let us look to the future together, a future of hope. And it won’t be easy, there will be challenges and we must give it time; but my stay here gives me more hope in what we can do together as friends, as family, as neighbors, together.”


I suppose all of us were at risk of a heart attack upon hearing these words from the President of the United States. After a ruthless blockade that has lasted almost 60 years, and what about those who have died in the mercenary attacks on Cuban ships and ports, an airliner full of passengers blown up in midair, mercenary invasions, multiple acts of violence and coercion?


Nobody should be under the illusion that the people of this dignified and selfless country will renounce the glory, the rights, or the spiritual wealth they have gained with the development of education, science and culture.


I also warn that we are capable of producing the food and material riches we need with the efforts and intelligence of our people. We do not need the empire to give us anything. Our efforts will be legal and peaceful, as this is our commitment to peace and fraternity among all human beings who live on this planet.


Fidel Castro Ruz 

March 27, 2016 10:25 p.m.